Beleaguered Napster circles bowl, subscribers drop 7 percent, Gorog won’t rule out sale of company

“Napster provided a disappointing outlook for its online music service and said its subscriber base had fallen 7 percent as it focused on promoting a new free Web site on Wednesday,” Sue Zeidler reports for Reuters.

Zeidler reports, “On a conference call with analysts, Chief Executive Officer Chris Gorog said he would not rule out a sale of the company. ‘We do not have our heads in the sand regarding an M&A (merger and acquisition) transaction. We continue to receive a lot of interest in the company. We will always carefully weigh any valuation alternative against the opportunity and risk associated with continuing as a standalone company,’ Gorog told analysts on a conference call.'”

“Napster reported a net loss of $9.8 million for the first fiscal quarter compared with a year-earlier loss of $19.9 million. Revenue rose to $28.1 million from $21 million,” Zeidler reports. “Napster’s total paid subscriber base as of June 30 was 512,000, including 4,000 university-paid subscriptions. Excluding university, the number of paid subscribers grew 26 percent year-over-year.”

Full article here.

[Thanks to MacDailyNews Reader “NeverFade” for the heads up.]

MacDailyNews Take: The gravy train of foolhardy colleges and universities has finally derailed for beleaguered Napster. To describe the outlook for beleaguered Napster as “dismal” would be far too charitable.

Related articles:
Free, legal and ignored: Mac- and iPod-incompatible beleaguered Napster dying at colleges – July 06, 2006
Survey: Apple iPod bigger than beer among college students – June 08, 2006
NCCU becomes first Apple ‘iTunes U’ school in North Carolina state system – June 06, 2006
Ohio University chooses Apple’s iTunes U for students and faculty – May 11, 2006
University of California puts video lectures on Apple’s ‘iTunes U’ – April 25, 2006
University of Pennsylvania excludes Mac users with Windows-only music service – March 21, 2006
Apple and Stanford University open ‘Stanford on iTunes’ to the public – January 25, 2006
Apple expands free, hosted ‘iTunes U’ service for colleges and universities – January 24, 2006
Cornell Student Assembly to vote on funding Mac- and iPod-incompatible Napster for another year – November 01, 2005
Why are Brown University’s Mac students being forced to pay for useless Napster? – September 06, 2005
College students refuse to buy a single song from Napster – July 10, 2005
Colleges should not exclude Mac and iPod users with Dell, Napster music hardware, software offering – July 06, 2005
Colleges offering students music services that aren’t cross-platform, don’t work with iPod – March 22, 2005
Cornell University’s Mac users ‘uniformly unhappy’ with Napster – January 19, 2005
Cornell University wrestles with Napster’s exclusion of Mac and iPod-using students – September 08, 2004
Why are Cornell’s Mac students being forced to pay for useless Napster? – September 07, 2004
Napster schools to Mac-using students: bend over and take it – September 04, 2004
Florida State University to sign deal with Apple for iTunes software – August 27, 2004

Napster CEO Gorog blames Microsoft for failure to compete with Apple’s iTunes Music Store – March 01, 2006
Napster CEO Chris Gorog has ‘secret plan’ to help beleaguered company become profitable – February 09, 2006
Google: no interest in Napster, no plans to develop music store at this time – January 31, 2006
Napster does the math: layoffs commence with 10-percent of workforce lopped off – January 25, 2006
EMI Music Chairman: Music subscription services like Napster and Rhapsody haven’t beeen huge – January 23, 2006
Napster CEO Gorog: ‘we are extremely excited about the future’ – January 18, 2006
Report: Napster executives do the math, consider selling or shutting down, layoffs imminent – January 16, 2006
Napster CEO Gorog: Apple iPod is a ‘villain’ – December 12, 2005
Do the math: Napster posts $13.6 million second-quarter loss – November 02, 2005
Napster President: Apple CEO Steve Jobs has ‘tricked people into buying a hardware trap’ – August 22, 2005
Apple’s roadkill whine in unison: ‘incompatibility is slowing growth of digital music’ – August 12, 2005
Napster: the only thing missing is the sock puppet – August 04, 2005
Napster, other Windows Media-based music services ‘chasing a niche opportunity’ – June 29, 2005
SmartMoney: Napster is a snooze, gushing money and renting music is un-American anyway – July 06, 2005
Napster To Go Soon? Reports $24.3 million net loss on $17.4 million net revenue – May 11, 2005
Napster is a joke – April 05, 2005
Napster CEO Gorog: Steve Jobs ‘must be pretty frightened’ of Napster To Go – March 14, 2005
Napster’s math does not add up – February 28, 2005
Users thwart Napster To Go’s copy protection; do the music labels realize the piracy potential? – February 15, 2005
Napster CEO Gorog: ‘it’s stupid to buy an iPod’ – February 10, 2005
$10,000 to fill an iPod? Napster’s going to end up with egg on their face – February 04, 2005
Why ‘Napster To Go’ will flop – February 03, 2005
Napster CEO: We’re ‘the biggest brand in digital music, much more exciting than Apple’s iTunes’ – February 03, 2005
The de facto standard for legal digital online music files: Apple’s protected MPEG-4 Audio (.m4p) – December 15, 2004
Napster CEO: ‘it would be great’ if Apple iPod supported WMA – March 09, 2004
Napster CEO: Apple iTunes, iPod ‘consumer-unfriendly experiences’ – March 09, 2004
Napster 2.0 posts US$15 million relaunch loss – February 08, 2004

23 Comments

  1. Maybe after their demise we’ll finally here the end of Subscription Music…I want to “own” my music…not pay for the privlege of listening to it. Pyay for it once…then listen to it endlessly.

  2. Napster has no compelling reason for people to continue to supscribe. They paid their $15 a month. Now they can switch to Zune no problem. Napster doesn’t have exclusive content, so why stick with the rip off of the file sharing pioneer?

  3. Napster reported a net loss of $9.8 million for the first fiscal quarter compared with a year-earlier loss of $19.9 million.

    I bet Gorog and his cronnies have bought themselves all new million dollar houses and fancy cars though. The real reason for starting this venture.

    Why would Apple turn down a profitable revenue source?

    If Gorog manages to sell Napster, he and all his cronnies would avoid the wrath of the investors wanting to strip him of everything he’s got.

  4. I wonder how those “4000” University subscriptions are calculated? Is that per student, or something bigger. Given that, for example, Penn State has “free” Napster for all of its students (more than 30,000), how does that 4000 figure tally?

    If its the number of students *actually using* it, I would understand!

  5. Sell the company? All they have of value is the name, and they have reduced the value of that consdiderabley.

    Maybe “Napster” could be the name of a new brand of baby nappies (diapers to you Yanks).

  6. speaking with limited use of articles: “Gorog business plan to make one billion dollars:
    First, start with two billion. Then…”

    Funny! It also sounds like the U.S. Congress. Just multiply by 1000.

    ” width=”19″ height=”19″ alt=”LOL” style=”border:0;” />

  7. I’ve been predicting that the story of Napster would end with their sale ever since the sorry plight of their finances became evident a year or two ago.

    However, I gotta wonder how much they’re worth these days. I think the “value” of the Napster name has pretty much expired. Younger consumers probably don’t even remember the original Napster all that well. And with the Zune service on the way, non-iTMS music stores are looking like a bad investment.

  8. Napster is not profitable and doesn’t work and Apple’s iTunes is totally profitable and does work. I seriously doubt Apple would want to buy a non-working model but would rather see them just disappear.

Reader Feedback

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.