CNBC’s Jim Goldman: Steve Jobs ‘health’ issue just gets curiouser and curiouser

“Yesterday’s mistake by the Associated Press about Steve Jobs and Apple’s conference call, and whether he was there, is commonly there, not commonly there, whether it was an indication of health issues, or no health issues, just struck me as weird,” Jim Goldman writes for CNBC.

“The background: When Apple began its conference call, Steve Jobs was absent. Chief Financial Officer Peter Oppenheimer handled the duties. And in a normal circumstance, that scenario would get little attention. But following the New York Post’s coverage yesterday morning about certain hedge fund managers ‘worried’ about Steve Jobs’ health, rehashing a bunch of details that were well over a month old, it brought the whole issue back into the discourse. And that’s probably what was on the mind of the Associated Press reporter covering the conference call, wondering why Jobs wasn’t present,” Goldman writes.

MacDailyNews Take: You can politely call what the Post did yesterday “coverage,” Jim; we’re sticking with “bullshit.”

Goldman continues, “She wrote in an early filing: ‘Steve Jobs, Apple’s chief executive, did not join the conference call with investors as he commonly does, prompting an analyst to inquire about his health. Jobs survived pancreatic cancer.'”

“Apple shares were already suffering enormous pressure heading into the call because of the company’s weaker than expected fourth quarter guidance,” Goldman writes. “But when this story, with those sentences, hit the wires, Apple’s plunge accelerated into a free-fall. Was Jobs ill? Did his absence from the call indicate that he wasn’t physically up to it? Were all those concerns a month ago, that finally began to dissipate, actually well-founded? It seemed investors were answering yes, yes, and yes, and drove Apple shares down dramatically. The message boards lit up like a Christmas tree with brutal speculation about what this all meant.”

“Investors, however, should have answered ‘no,’ ‘no,’ and ‘no.,'” Goldman explains. “You see, Jobs is never on the company’s earnings call. Never. Ever. And anyone covering this company knows it. And anyone investing in the company should know it. And that’s why that sentence in the AP story is so troubling, and so factually off base.”

More in the full article – recommended – here.

[Thanks to MacDailyNews Reader “JES42” for the heads up.]

40 Comments

  1. After answering umpteen idiotic similar questions, Apple can say it’s a private matter. Saying he’s OK doesn’t shut off the speculation anyway.

    Of course they could hold a conference with multiple charts and diagrams of every organ in CT scan 3D, animated, holographic, traveling through every blood vessel, with a panel of Dr commentary, and dissect every hiccup and bowel movement on international TV, as if that would quell the rabid jealous devious scavengers who want to take the polish off Apple’s well-deserved success.

    Apple might want to have its amusement with a Ross Perot – Ronald Reagan diagram-fest that gives so much info about every body system that med school students will fall asleep. Or they could float a new rumor, “Steve has sex with alien intergalactic monopoly goddess while undergoing surgery for splinx redaction reformation.”

    Whatever they do, it won’t be good enough, will be twisted in multiple bizarre media contortions, and will cause the stock to plummet.

    Meanwhile, Apple continues to launch and support excellent products, develop even better ones, and show strong sales.

  2. “Steve Jobs might already be dead for all we know.”

    Actually, if he was dead, I believe Apple would build an android in his image that would last for 6,000 years, thus eliminating any investor worries for “a few years”. Of course, the android would be powered by OSX.

  3. When Lance Armstrong returned to bicycle racing after months of surgery and chemotherapy for testicular and brain cancer, people were shocked by his appearance. He had lost 20 percent of his body mass.

    Seven consecutive Tours de France wins later, those questions magically melted away.

    An unfortunate side effect of pancreatic cancer and the treatment (including surgery) for it often leaves the survior robust, but with significantly decreased body mass. In addition, the survivor’s metabolism and digestion changes permanently, making it a challenge for the person to regain weight that they had lost. In no way does this threaten the health of the person, but they emerge from the experience with reduced body mass.

    It’s sad that the media fails to investigate this medical fact, much less report it.

    In addition, there is a federal law named HIPAA (the Health Insurance Privacy and Portability Act). Under HIPAA, an individual’s right to the privacy of his or her medical information is protected. Each of us are under no obligation to disclose anything about our medical condition to anyone. If you read the healthcare trade publications as I do every day, a patient’s medical privacy is a regularly reported topic.

    In the light of the above, I find it odd that this is an issue at all.

    With facts so transparent as these, I can only conclude that repeated reports and speculation on an individual’s health aren’t being raised by accident. Sad.

  4. One last thing.

    What if the truth was that he had a relapse and was terminal? The first thing I would think of would be how I felt bad for him and his family, friends and co-workers. The guy is a genius – he reinvented a company that may have completely disappeared ten years ago. But he is also human. Last time I checked, human beings are born, they live, and they DIE. Not to sound too morbid, but that’s the hard truth about life. So at first, think about what his family and friends may be going through if this was indeed true.

    Considering their size and their massive success, to think that a company like Apple does not have a succession plan is foolhardy to say the least. The future of the company is too important, and the vision that Steve (and others) have laid out are too powerful to just die with him. If anything, Apple is making a serious blunder not discussing a succession plan of any kind to ease investor worries REGARDLESS of Jobs’ health. Maybe they aren’t bound to do so, but that would be prudent for any company.

    I hope and pray Steve is well. If he isn’t, I wish him a speedy recovery.

    Ferf

  5. This is the trouble with our little cult… outsiders actually think the health of one (albeit significant) member affects the health of the entire organization.

    Basically, I think they are trying to force Steve to stand up and declare “I am fine, please leave me alone” before they stop spreading FUD like cheese on pasta.

  6. Well Folks

    In a Nation where 50% of the population is ‘over-weight’

    And 1/3+ is just plain flat out obese

    We can figure a ‘skinny’ person – even if that is the norm for most of the World, and has been for 1,000s of years – will be considered ‘unhealthy’

    Says more about our lazy-fat-ass population than it does about Steve

    BC

    and, yes, I’m skinny too ” width=”19″ height=”19″ alt=”grin” style=”border:0;” />

Reader Feedback

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.