CNBC’s Mason: Microsoft is clueless
Monday, January 12, 2009 - 12:00 PM EST "Among computer geeks of a certain age Microsoft has long been synonymous with the word evil. I think that's giving the brass at Microsoft a little too much credit. To me, they're just clueless," Cliff Mason writes for CNBC.MacDailyNews Take: Microsoft's always been clueless, it's nice to see that more and more people are realizing it with each passing day.
"Witness this story in today's Wall Street Journal, 'Microsoft Betting Big on 'Touch,'' about how Microsoft is the largest investor in the latest, $24 million round of fundraising for an Israeli company that makes touch-screen computer hardware, and how it's integrating the software for touch-screen PCs into Windows 7, the successor to the debacle known as Vista," Mason writes.
"The article makes it sound as though they expect touch-screen PCs to be the next big thing with the potential to at least partially displace the mouse," Mason writes. "That's simply not gonna happen. I'm not the most tech savvy guy in the universe, but I do spend most of my life sitting in front of a computer. And from my perspective in front of the monitor, it's completely obvious that touch-screen PCs will never be more than a niche market."
Mason writes, "Consider this: the monitor on my laptop is 15 inches wide. My track-pad is maybe 3 inches wide. But I can swipe my finger across 3 inches of pad and have the pointer move across 15 inches of screen, and that's with a lousy track-pad, not even a real mouse. With a touch-screen I'd have to move my whole arm across the face of the computer just to drag and drop something. It's just simply geometry."
Full article here.
MacDailyNews Take: It's all about Gorilla Arm.
[Thanks to MacDailyNews Reader "Fred Mertz" for the heads up.]


I don't get why everybody is so excited about touch screen PC's. While it is definitely cool in a demo (or in a movie: Minority Report), how long before your arms become tired? It makes more sense when the display is laying flat on the table, but not sitting in front of you. I think a trackpad that acts as the touch-screen input makes much more sense. It is flat, and small; much more ergo friendly to a humans arm!