MacDailyNews - Where Mac news comes first

 MacDailyNews Poll

Deal of the Day

5 Day Most Commented

Opinion Archive

Current Headlines

Latest Joy of Tech

  • Latest Joy of Tech!

MacNN

AppleInsider

Macworld UK

TUAW

MacRumors

Yahoo! Finance AAPL

iTunes Top 10 Albums

Mac OS X Downloads

Sat, Nov 21, 2009 - 04:16 PM EST  —  AAPL: 199.92 (-0.59, -0.29%)  |  NASDAQ: 2146.04 (-10.78, -0.5%)

Mossberg: Apple’s Mac OS X Leopard will allow Windows Vista to run on Macs
Thursday, April 27, 2006 - 01:03 PM EST

Each week The Wall Street Journal's Walter S. Mossberg answers tech questions for his readers. This week, one question touches on Apple's Boot Camp:

Q: Apple's Boot Camp program for running Windows on a Mac is a beta. Any idea when a final version will be out? And will Boot Camp allow Macs to run the new Vista version of Windows?
A: Boot Camp may never be final, because Apple plans to roll its functionality into the forthcoming new version of its OS X operating system, called Leopard, which is due out early in 2007, around the same time Microsoft plans to ship Windows Vista. I assume Apple will stop offering Boot Camp as a separate program around that time. The company states that "Boot Camp Beta is preview software licensed for use on a trial basis for a limited time." That implies to me that it will likely be discontinued when Leopard comes out. This doesn't necessarily mean existing installations of Windows on Macs will stop functioning, just that new downloads won't be available. I do believe that Leopard will allow Vista to run on Macs. However, just like regular Windows PCs, Macs running Vista will be able to use all of its features only if their hardware specs are hefty enough. My quick and dirty assessment is that the Intel-based iMac, MacBook Pro and Mac mini should be able to do so, but only time will tell.


Mossberg's Mailbox is here.

Advertisements:
Get the new iMac with Intel Core Duo for as low as $31 A MONTH with Free shipping!
Get the MacBook Pro with Intel Core Duo for as low as $47 A MONTH with Free Shipping!
Apple's new Mac mini. Intel Core, up to 4 times faster. Starting at just $599. Free shipping.
Apple's brand new iPod Hi-Fi speaker system. Home stereo. Reinvented. Available now for $349 with free shipping.
iPod. 15,000 songs. 25,000 photos. 150 hours of video. The new iPod. 30GB and 60GB models start at just $299. Free shipping.
Connect iPod to your television set with the iPod AV Cable. Just $19.
iPod Radio Remote. Listen to FM radio on your iPod and control everything with a convenient wired remote. Just $49.

Related articles:
Apple implementing Windows API directly in Mac OS X Leopard? (Windows apps on Mac without Windows) - April 21, 2006
Apple ready to take back market share; may debut Windows virtualization in Mac OS X Leopard - April 21, 2006
Apple confirms 'sneak peek preview' of Mac OS X Leopard at WWDC 2006 this August - April 18, 2006
Apple's Boot Camp is first step towards Mac OS X Leopard's inevitable support for virtualization - April 11, 2006
Dude, you got a Dell? What are you, stupid? Only Apple Macs run both Mac OS X and Windows! - April 05, 2006
RUMOR: Mac OS X 10.5 Leopard features revealed - April 04, 2006
Apple CEO Steve Jobs' ultimate goal: 'to take back the computer business from Microsoft' - June 16, 2005

Bookmark and Share

Always -- Free ground shipping with orders over $50 at the Apple Store.

Reader Feedback: = registered.
Unregistered users: Feedback from multiple usernames are subject to deletion. Off-topic and posts from suspected astroturfers will be removed.

Apr 27, 06 - 01:17 pm Comment from: clyde

Will 10.5 allow ppc macs to run windows apps as well?

Apr 27, 06 - 01:19 pm Comment from: jon

clyde,

No.

Apr 27, 06 - 01:25 pm Comment from: Jim

Who really cares about running Vista vaporware anyway? Let's get into the habit of calling it what it really is:

M$ Windows Vista = Mac OS X 10.1 alpha 1.

Why waste precious HDD space and functioning hair follicles on a virus?

Apr 27, 06 - 01:25 pm Comment from: Ampar

Shouldn't Boot Camp last no longer than 6, 9, or 12 weeks?

Apr 27, 06 - 01:25 pm Comment from: Big Tex

Mossberg can go to hell

Apr 27, 06 - 01:26 pm Comment from: Professor Bunson Honeydew

no - gotta have Intel inside (x86)

Apr 27, 06 - 01:29 pm Comment from: Andrew

Will 10.5 allow ppc macs to run windows apps as well?

Most likely not as Microsoft already has a product in that space called Virtual PC.

I don't think we are going to see Microsoft's API's running under Mac OS X, not from Apple anyway, even though Apple could do it. It gives M$ a opportunity to mess with Apple and all those who come to depend upon Windows apps to run under Mac OS X.

Perhaps later Apple will, or some third party company will, because Microsoft will release Vista and be locked into the API's for some time.

We might be switching back and forth from full to alternalte virtualizations.

Apr 27, 06 - 01:32 pm Comment from: G-ZUS

Can Apple run a fictional operating system? No. If Vista ever becomes real, Apple will probably be able to run it. wink

http://musobs.blogspot.com/

Apr 27, 06 - 01:36 pm Comment from: Ampar

I seriously doubt that VPC for the Mac will be developed any longer. It's purpose has become obsolete. Slow emulator that won't run games and some programs or native speed in a partition?

Apr 27, 06 - 01:42 pm Comment from: Ryan

If you want to run Windows apps without buying Windows, just put Linux in a Parallels Worsktation virtual machine and install Wine on it.

After you've had that experience, come back and let us know if you still think this is something Apple could/should do in OS X.

tongue laugh

Apr 27, 06 - 01:51 pm Comment from: Professor Bunson Honeydew

why does any OS X user give a Damn about using Windows.


We all know what an abortion is is so what's all the curiousity about?

I can understand Windows users being interested but OS X users?

Who cares if you use the occasional application that requires every once in a while! Do you enjoy drawing attention to yourselves with the association of windows? What a shame! If you drove a Lexus but had to use a ford occasionally at work would you be energized by that or whould you even notice - other than is sucks and "boy can't wait to drive my LS430?"

Windows doen not deserve the the slightest bit of acknowlgement or attention.

Ignore it and avoid it like the plague!

Move along people, there is nothing to see here!!!

Apr 27, 06 - 01:54 pm Comment from: Freddie Pells

G-ZUZ, I don't usually whine like this, but I wish you'd put in some line separators or something to make it clear that the musobs site you always advertise in your posts is just a sig.

After clicking on your link (five or six times in different posts) thinking it's a link to an article relevant to your post, it gets irritating to realize you aren't linking to anything relevant, just pimping your site.

Not trying to start a flame war, just constructive criticism.

Apr 27, 06 - 01:59 pm Comment from: jay

I've a similar analogy before. What if you needed to haul a cord of firewood or several hundred feet of sod. Do you want to put it in the Lexus? Would it even fit? Do you go around ALWAYS saying I've got a Lexus, what the hell does anyone need a truck for?

You use Doze because that's the best tool available that does the job. OS X is great, but it can not do it all.

Apr 27, 06 - 02:01 pm Comment from: gforce

hefty enough? All MacTel boxes are way "heftier" than the majority of PC's out there...if they're not "hefty" enough then neither is your neighbor's Dell.

Apr 27, 06 - 02:05 pm Comment from: John John

The professor said it all. Only thing is, nobody wants to answer the question if this is really is the beginning of the end of Mac OS and the only choice we Mac Intel suckers are left with is Big Blue... I mean, Big Yellow.

Apr 27, 06 - 02:15 pm Comment from: Dead Squirrel

"M$ Windows Vista = Mac OS X 10.1 alpha 1."

Oh, so it's Mac OS X 10.0? wink

Apr 27, 06 - 02:29 pm Comment from: Albertho

I am very smart person, lik you. Have Mirosoft MCP certificat which is best there is. We have told that Windows is best operating system, and so why do I come web site? To tel you to know it. Thank you for it.

Please visit web site.

Apr 27, 06 - 02:40 pm Comment from: Jimg

If no OSX users care about Windows, why did the Steve bless Windows for his Macs?

No Windows users is going to buy a Mac to run Windows. They already have a computer that runs windows!!!

Apr 27, 06 - 02:42 pm Comment from: TimD

Leopard will knock spots off Vista!

Apr 27, 06 - 02:48 pm Comment from: Professor Bunson Honeydew

"If no OSX users care about Windows, why did the Steve bless Windows for his Macs?"

Dude!!! it's to get them to taste the green grass and get out of the weed corral. Not because he sees any value in windows.

Are you saying Grass Hoppa' Jobs jimmied OS X because he sees the value of windows?

Think again. Think Different. It's to ween these weenies off of windows.

Apr 27, 06 - 03:04 pm Comment from: bill

Is it true that Leopard is scheduled early 2007, as Mossberg states?

Apr 27, 06 - 03:11 pm Comment from: "Think Different"

I have been a loyal Macintosh user since the days of the SE30, and I wonder how many folks on this site even remember the SE30. For a very brief time I was "forced" (job requirement) to use Windows 3.0 which I thought was my penance here in this earth.
After reading these comments since the introduction of BootCamp, I have yet to read about one incident where the person identifies the real reason why they "have" to run Windows on their MAC. My uneducated guess would be that BootCamp is just another toy for some to run on their MAC.
To each their own, I guess, but I have seen and experienced the Macintosh operating system since the days of System 6, and all I have seen are improvements. I remember doing a tabletop dance when Apple finally got rid of those bothersome "extensions."
Oh well, I just thought I would add my cooments to all the rest.
One more thing--if that "windows" program doesn't run, just remember how many "drivers" you'll have to hunt for just to get it to run.

Apr 27, 06 - 03:23 pm Comment from: crayon1

I think most people writing about boot camp are missing the point.
Boot camp isn't a move towards every computer running any OS...
It is rather to put OS X in a position that breaks the MS deathgrip
on the world's computers by killing off Vista...

The most intelligent analysis i've read on the matter
really puts things into perspective

http://www.pbs.org/cringely/pulpit/pulpit20060420.html

Apr 27, 06 - 03:30 pm Comment from: Jim - the independent voter

Think different...

I've got two friends who are in real estate... they have to use windows because there are no corresponding equivalent apps available for them on the mac.

I've been with Apple a long time as you have, my first was an IIc, and my first mac was a classic.

Both my friends are buying intel iMacs as we speak.

Apr 27, 06 - 03:57 pm Comment from: sn

Why Vista on a Mac? For those hard-core gamers:

HALO 2.

Apr 27, 06 - 03:59 pm Comment from: sn

bill,

Yeah I thought that Leopard was scheduled for Q3 of this year, or about the same time they'll be putting the Merom chipset in the MacBooks.

Apr 27, 06 - 04:08 pm Comment from: Turd Ferguson

I'm sorry, but Mossburg is an idiot. Big deal that OS X will run Winblows crapware. I'm sure there are about a thousand better reasons to talk about OS X Leopard then something that involves M$! Winblows is crap, pure and simple. Its like a generic OS; a transparent shell with so many holes that makes it about as useful as a screen door on a submarine.

Fsck off, M$ trolls.

Op-ed piece written on a beloved PB 1.5 12".

Apr 27, 06 - 04:44 pm Comment from: maczealot

After installing 10.5 I will be installing no other OS. Don't need to, don't want to. Baby's been good to me, ain't gonna cheat on her.

Apr 27, 06 - 04:55 pm Comment from: ishufflemyfeet

I'll say it again, Windows on a Mac? Meh!

Who cares? Only a small group of geeks.

Another Windows on a Mac artical on MDN, what a shock.

Yawn...

Apr 27, 06 - 06:01 pm Comment from: clyde

Too bad about 10.5 not allowing windows apps on a ppc mac. There's a couple of windows programs that I'd like to use, and I HATE virtual PC. Virtual PC is like working on a 386...

Apr 27, 06 - 06:58 pm Comment from: Chunky Monkey

I don't WANT to run a Windows program AT ALL. But I HAVE TO for our business, since Quickbooks is the standard and Intuit keeps the Mac version CRIPPLED by comparison.

I have a piece of garbage PC sharing desk space with a backup Mac right now, and I desperately want to get rid of the damn thing. This functionality in Leopard will allow us to do that. Finally.

So, that's MY reason "ishufflemyfeet" and "Think Different". The Quickbooks Mac version is woeful by comparison, and, ya know . . . I HAVE TO RUN MY BUSINESS!!!!!!!!!

This forthcoming feature of Leopard is NOT only for geeks.

Apr 27, 06 - 07:59 pm Comment from: Fuzzy Bo

@Chunky Monkey "I HAVE TO RUN MY BUSINESS!!!"
So do I, and I use MYOB.
grin

Apr 27, 06 - 08:20 pm Comment from: b ill

If I could run Windows apps under OS X, I would be the happiest guy in Vermont. THen maybe I could convince the powers that be to get me a Mac notebook.

There are several programs which I rely on to be compatible with my job. One is Access. And I know you'll say Filemaker this and that, but if everybody else is running Access I ain't cutting that cheese. Number two is WordPerfect. OMG, I know there is a very old Previous generation Wordperfect running around out in webland, but I would be very suprised if there weren't any glitches sharing with the WordPerfect 9 world. Last, but not least is Outlook. What I wonder about is how well Entourage could substitute. Does it do calander and contacts as well? Are there some tricks it can't turn?

Anyhow, all those concerneds would be wiped away if I could run Windows apps simultaneously. My life may finally be able to communicate with itself. The Mac would be like that curvy line haolding the yin to the yang. I need em both.

Apr 27, 06 - 09:44 pm Comment from: Chunky Monkey

Fuzzy Bo: " ... and I use MYOB."

That's great for you. But most accountants don't.

Our accountant is a former IRS agent, and he prefers Quickbooks. As do the majority of people needing an accounting solution. And since our guy is formerly from the "dark side" and that kind of information and those kinds of connections are invaluable, I'll stick with what he prefers.

Besides, we tried MYOB once and it too lacks some of the features and support of Quickbooks.

Don't get me wrong: If Intuit didn't completely suck ass they'd simply make the Mac version completely equivalent. But they do and they won't.

So until then, something like this feature appearing in LEopard would be ohhh soooo sweeeeet.

Apr 27, 06 - 10:20 pm Comment from: Badpop

I wouldn't piss on Intuit if they where on fire.

Apr 28, 06 - 01:06 am Comment from: Confusion says

Wha...? I thought Mossberg was one of the "blessed" ones, one of those journalists who "got" it? The very second he even dares to say "Windows" in the same breath as "Apple" without being negative, you turn on him? My, how fickle you some of you people are...

May 24, 06 - 01:13 pm Comment from: Christopher Sherman

I own both and use both. I am in the IT field and have uses for both. I think both have great and not so great points. What i dont get is why people perfer one over the other. I am at an advantage to most of the people i work with because i can do both. Notebooks do not take up that much space.

Reader feedback page 1 of 1 pages:

Always -- Free ground shipping with orders over $50 at the Apple Store.

Add Your Feedback:

Register or Login

Name:

Email: (optional)

Emoticons | Allowed HTML Tags

Remember my info   Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the "MDN Magic Word" you see in the image below: