MacDailyNews - Where Mac news comes first

 MacDailyNews Poll

Deal of the Day

5 Day Most Commented

Opinion Archive

Current Headlines

Latest Joy of Tech

  • Latest Joy of Tech!

MacNN

AppleInsider

Macworld UK

TUAW

MacRumors

Yahoo! Finance AAPL

iTunes Top 10 Albums

Mac OS X Downloads

Mon, Mar 15, 2010 - 10:27 PM EDT  —  AAPL: 223.84 (-2.76, -1.22%)  |  NASDAQ: 2362.21 (-5.45, -0.23%)

Mossberg reviews Apple’s Mac OS X Leopard: ‘better and faster than Windows Vista’
Thursday, October 25, 2007 - 09:26 AM EDT

There are several reasons why Apple Macs are taking market share from Microsoft Windows PCs, "including the security problems in the dominant Windows platform from Microsoft; spillover from Apple’s blistering success with its iPod music players; the fact that Macs can now run Windows programs; and Apple’s highly successful chain of company-owned retail stores," Walter S. Mossberg reports for The Wall Street Journal.

"But another key factor has been the Mac operating system, called OS X, which came out in 2001. It has proved to be as powerful and versatile for mainstream consumers as Windows, yet easier to use and more secure. And Apple has upgraded OS X far more rapidly than Microsoft Inc. has upgraded Windows, bringing out major new releases roughly every 18 months, while Microsoft struggled for more than five years to produce the latest Windows iteration, Vista, which came out in January," Mossberg reports.

"On Friday evening, Apple will release yet another new version of OS X, called Leopard, to replace the current version, known as Tiger. I’ve been testing Leopard, and while it is an evolutionary, not a revolutionary, release, I believe it builds on Apple’s quality advantage over Windows. In my view, Leopard is better and faster than Vista, with a set of new features that make Macs even easier to use," Mossberg reports.

"Every piece of software and hardware I tried on two Leopard-equipped Macs — a loaned laptop from Apple and my own upgraded iMac — worked fine, exhibiting none of the compatibility problems that continue to plague Vista. My old Hewlett-Packard inkjet printer, for which Vista lacks the proper software, worked instantly in Leopard, even over the network. And, unlike with Vista, it was able to print on both sides of the page. I popped my old Verizon cellphone modem card into the test Leopard laptop and it worked, too, with no software installation or tweaking," Mossberg reports.

"Leopard isn’t a must-have for current Mac owners, but it adds a lot of value. For new Mac buyers, it makes switching even more attractive," Mossberg reports.

Mossberg's video review:


Full article here.

MacDailyNews Take: "Better and faster than Windows Vista" isn't saying much. That's like saying any new car is better than a recently Earl Scheib'ed Yugo. Mac OS X 10.4 Tiger — and, for that matter, Mac OS X 10.3 Panther, Mac OS X 10.2 Jaguar, and even Mac OS X 10.1 Puma — are already better and faster than Vista.

Still, overall, it's a nice review from Mossberg who, in saying that Leopard isn't a "must-have" for current Mac owners, is really praising the quality of Mac OS X Tiger.

Regardless of Uncle Walt's opinion, Leopard is most certainly a "must have" for us as we strongly believe that it adds far more than US$129 worth of value to our Macs.

Bookmark and Share

Always -- Free ground shipping with orders over $50 at the Apple Store.

Reader Feedback: = registered.
Unregistered users: Feedback from multiple usernames are subject to deletion. Off-topic and posts from suspected astroturfers will be removed.

Reader feedback page 1 of 1 pages:
Oct 25, 07 - 09:30 am Comment from: Macromancer

I think what he meant to say was Mac OS 10.2 Jaguar is better and faster than Vista.

Oct 25, 07 - 09:30 am Comment from: OctoberMac

I just got my shipment notice from Apple and FedEx, so I should have it at my house tomorrow! WooT!

Oct 25, 07 - 09:35 am Comment from: G Spank

For any designer, the way you can look at your images in the finder is alone easily worth the cost. And time machine, wow.

Oct 25, 07 - 09:45 am Comment from: Jim

I'm finishing work at 4pm tomorrow, travelling down the M56/M60 to the Trafford Centre and should (traffic permitting) be at the  Store for 5:30pm...

I just hope there are no queues. Unlikely, but I can always hope.

BRING IT ON!!!!

Oct 25, 07 - 09:51 am Comment from: .RO

XP is better and faster than Vista
Win 2000 is better faster than XP

Oct 25, 07 - 09:55 am Comment from: Zune Tang

Another load of crap review from somebody who doesn't know better. The best part is the one MAC lemming where I work will be sending me this review in e-mail, then at lunch he's going ask me if I read it. I'll tell him that I don't have time for toys but I did forward the review to the IT staff and I could hear them laughing from down the hall.

This particular MAC lemming keeps asking IT for a MAC and they always turn him down. It's priceless. If he thinks this Leopard, or Pussy or whatever is going to change their minds he's kidding himself. What's the point? It looks like a cheap Vista anyway.

Your potential. Our passion.™

Oct 25, 07 - 10:00 am Comment from: CandTsmac

Walt. No matter how much better the Mac stuff is, he can't quite give it full praise.

This is a MUST have upgrade.

He is still a cool dude though.

Oct 25, 07 - 10:06 am Comment from: Switched

..better than Vista....

NO shit Moss!!!!

Oct 25, 07 - 10:10 am Comment from: iMac G4 800 MHz

It was a "must have" for me until Apple upped the minimum system requirements to 866 MHz. Oh well, I really need to go to Intel anyway. I just can't afford it yet.

Oct 25, 07 - 10:12 am Comment from: Hmmmm...

Many thought that OS 9 was better and faster than Cheetah.

Oct 25, 07 - 10:13 am Comment from: iSteve

Do we know the namem for 10.6 yet?

Oct 25, 07 - 10:18 am Comment from: Lig

Heh my Yugo still runs.....

Oct 25, 07 - 10:18 am Comment from: Artist

"in saying that Leopard isn't a "must-have" for current Mac owners, is really praising the quality of Mac OS X Tiger."

That's reaching

Oct 25, 07 - 10:19 am Comment from: Bill in Florida

Is there yet a comparison of 10.4.10 to 10.5.0? What are the benefits of upgrading first?

Will probably wait for 10.5.2

Oct 25, 07 - 10:23 am Comment from: Gman

Just received a email -- CompUSA will have Leopard for sale Friday @ only $99!!!

Oct 25, 07 - 10:31 am Comment from: Acetylcholinesterase

"Many thought that OS 9 was better and faster than Cheetah."

And I really miss extension conflicts and hard freezes.

Oct 25, 07 - 10:39 am Comment from: Dolita

"Many thought that OS 9 was better and faster than Cheetah."
Does that mean Vista equals to 10.0 and the next iteration of Vista would equal to 10.1? Which means PC users must wait for the next update?

Too bad it wont come out until 2012.

Oct 25, 07 - 10:58 am Comment from: shen

wow, thanks for he MDN take, i was going to say, "setting the bar pretty low there Walt."

Oct 25, 07 - 11:08 am Comment from: Wingsy

My copy was picked up by FedEx at 6AM in Addison, TX for overnight delivery! I should have it before noon.

Oct 25, 07 - 11:10 am Comment from: Yakov

MDN, I think, misses the analogy train here.

Vista isn't a Yugo - it's not THAT bad.

Think of Vista as an Infiniti luxury sedan. It looks great, but under the hood, it's a Hyundai.

OS-X is more like an Acura or a Lexus. They look great, and they perform spectacularly.

Oct 25, 07 - 11:24 am Comment from: de koelsche jung

It's always been problematic that the company is called Apple, but the computers are called Macs. Not MACs or M.A.C.s, or Apples, or Apple Macs, or Apple MACs. It even sounds weird when you say "Apple Macs," although technically it may be true, similar to "Honda Civic." You can call a Civic a Honda, but that's being broad, but doesn't quite work with a Mac, unless you want to sound like a hick or tard.

Zune Tang seems to fit this profile, along with the small minority who refuse to open their eyes about anything. If they can't get the name right, then there's no hope.

Oct 25, 07 - 11:32 am Comment from: Artist

" Think of Vista as an Infiniti luxury sedan. It looks great, but under the hood, it's a Hyundai."

Since when did Nissan start using Hyundai engines?

Oct 25, 07 - 11:33 am Comment from: Ray

Mossberg nailed it on the head.

Oct 25, 07 - 12:09 pm Comment from: Ballmer's Left Nut

I miss the original Zune Tang. Much more clever and entertaining.

Oct 25, 07 - 12:15 pm Comment from: Oh No

Goatberg has his marching orders.

Oct 25, 07 - 12:21 pm Comment from: Rexy

While I think 10.2 is at least on par with Vista, I've got to disagree with MDN saying that 10.1 was better. 10.0 and 10.1 were really fairly terrible. Version 10.2 was the first truly usable iteration of OS X in my opinion, and the one that made me switch. Tiger is fantastic, though. After using 10.4 for so long now, I find myself hamstrung whenever trying to use a computer without spotlight.

Oct 25, 07 - 12:21 pm Comment from: larry

I agree. This Zune Tang is like the second Darrin Stevens. Humorless annoying sissy.

Oct 25, 07 - 12:55 pm Comment from: jarrettnewsdaily

Just think, Microsoft is saying that the next release of Windows will be in 2010, yes 2010 and will be named Windows 7. That means easily 2011, could you image waiting 3 or 4 years for an update to your operating system. What a sad state of affairs. IT people are getting really nervous with the amount of MAC sales this quarter, and it only gets worse with the Christmas quarter underway. Just watch MAC sales top 3 million, iPod sales top 20 million (again, maybe depends on iPhone) and iPhone sales to top 3 million this quarter.

That's my shot, you read here first 3-20-3

MAC's 4.2 Billion
iPod's 4.0 Billion
iPhone's 1.3 Billion
Software, iTunes, ect 800 million
Total 10.3 billion

WDN word, I kid you not "fiscal" how creepy

Oct 25, 07 - 12:59 pm Comment from: mm

Note to new zune tang:

Give it up--you suck.

Oct 25, 07 - 01:07 pm Comment from: Cubert

@ Bill in Florida,
The speed increase of the Finder, apps, app launch times, and the GUI in general should be enough for you. Developers are saying that Leopard is noticeably faster than Tiger on any supported machine.

Oct 25, 07 - 01:09 pm Comment from: Cubert

@jarretnewsdaily,
It's Mac, not MAC. Unless, you are really talking about the makeup company and their sales.

Oct 25, 07 - 01:26 pm Comment from: Feature Request

I want to keep my folders from 10.4x instead of the Microsoft looking cartoon folders in 10.5. How do I do it? Those things are butt ugly.

Oct 25, 07 - 02:09 pm Comment from: Zune Tang

...and another thing...

My Yugo still gets 30 mpg and I love it! It's already better than most new cars out there! Also, my brown Zune is just cool! It matches the Yugo's interior. So much better than iPod! Review that Mossberg!

Oct 26, 07 - 09:51 pm Comment from: Vista Sucks

I hope all these windows loosers don't come around to mac os. why? 'cause those Asshoe will bring virus infestive asses with them to our God given's Leopard... Stay over to your ms crapshits vista over there. don't come here to our mac os x. WE DON'T WANT YOU!!! GET IT...! (Especially for you!... Zune Tang! What's your last name? Dumass?) or is it DUMB_ASS?...
what a Dum...ass! Bastarddd!

Reader feedback page 1 of 1 pages:

Always -- Free ground shipping with orders over $50 at the Apple Store.

Add Your Feedback:

Register or Login

Name:

Email: (optional)

Emoticons | Allowed HTML Tags

Remember my info   Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the "MDN Magic Word" you see in the image below: