Music labels say no deal with Qtrax; music player software ‘sucks bad’
Tuesday, January 29, 2008 - 08:43 AM EDT "The world's biggest music companies, including Warner Music Group Corp and Sony BMG, denied that they have agreed to license songs for a free download service that was launched by Qtrax on Monday," Yinka Adegoke reports for Reuters."Qtrax told Reuters and other media outlets last week that it had deals with the major labels representing about 75 percent of all music sales, to let users download songs for free in a new service to be supported by advertising revenue," Adegoke reports.
"But by Monday, Sony BMG Music Entertainment and Warner had publicly denied that they had agreed to back the new Qtrax service," Adegoke reports.
"A source close to Universal Music, the largest of the group, said it also had not signed a deal for the new Qtrax service and is still in discussions," Adegoke reports. "And a source close to EMI Group said that while its song publishing unit has an agreement with Qtrax, its recorded music arm, EMI Music, does not."
Full article here.
Humphrey Cheung reports for TG Daily, "It’s not often that we put 'sucks bad' in a title, but the beta Qtrax music player truly disappoints. After all the hype of allowing millions of freely playable songs, the so-called 'Songbird' beta program is excruciating slow, crashes often and doesn’t even offer any music."
"But don’t be completely disappointed folks, at least Qtrax got the ads to work correctly," Cheung reports.
Full article here.
[Thanks to MacDailyNews Readers "Carl H." and "Macaday" for the heads up.]
MacDailyNews Take: The whole thing is shaping up as the joke of the year so far. The Qtrax experience sounds positively Windows-like and — sheesh! — even Microsoft knows enough to get ink before they issue press releases and launch half-baked software.

It really does suck!