Music’s online holdouts: The Beatles, Led Zepplin, AC/DC, Garth Brooks, and more
Friday, February 16, 2007 - 01:19 PM EST"When will digital music consumers finally be able to meet the Beatles? Sooner than later it seems: Anticipation is building that the group's storied recordings will be available for (legal) digital download, now that Apple Corps, which oversees the catalog, has settled litigation over its name with Steve Jobs' Apple," Louis Hau reports for Forbes.
Hau reports, "But while the Beatles have been the most prominent digital holdouts, they aren't the only ones. Even though the vast majority of well-known recording artists now sell their music online, you still can't buy a digital copy of AC/DC's 'You Shook Me All Night Long' or 'Back In Black.'"
"In fact, virtually none of the Australian hard-rock veterans' music is available as a legal download anywhere on the Web. Ditto for Led Zeppelin. And the same is true, except for the occasional tribute album contribution, for Garth Brooks," Hau reports.
Hau reports, "The desire among some artists to retain control over the use of their music, continued ambivalence about new technologies and legal challenges in securing the necessary rights continue to keep some prominent song catalogs from being widely available for downloading. The result is a crazy quilt of restrictions that can frustrate their fans and their record labels."
Full article with mention of John Lennon, Paul McCartney, Radiohead, and more here.
Send us links! Email: webmaster@macdailynews.com
MacDailyNews and iPodDailyNews are Apple Store affiliates and if you buy something from the Apple Store within 24-hours after clicking any one of our Apple Store ads, we will receive an affiliate percentage from Apple. There is no extra cost to you. Canadians please use this link: Apple Store Canada. Thank you in advance for helping to support MacDailyNews and iPodDailyNews.
Apple Store Advertisements:
• The all-new 13-inch MacBook. The next generation of notebooks starts at $1299.
• The all-new 15-inch Macbook Pro. New design. New features. New technologies. From $1999.
• The all-in-one iMac. Now at speeds up to 3.06GHz. Free shipping. From $1199.
• iPod touch. The funnest iPod ever. Starting at $229. Free Shipping.
• iPod nano. New design. New features. Starting at $149. Free shipping.
• Visit the Apple Store today. Free ground shipping on all orders over $50.
MacDailyNews on Twitter
Related articles:
Why Apple iTunes Store + The Beatles would be a very big deal - February 06, 2007
Wired News: Apple iPods pre-loaded with music are about to become the new CD - February 06, 2007
NPD’s Crupnick: Beatles-iTunes deal ‘almost certain’ - February 05, 2007
Apple Inc. and The Beatles’ Apple Corps Ltd. enter into new agreement - February 05, 2007
The Beatles to share the love with Apple’s iTunes Store on Valentine’s Day? - January 16, 2007
Apple close to offering Beatles music via iTunes Store - December 05, 2006
Fortune: Apple close to landing exclusive iTunes Store deal with The Beatles - November 27, 2006
The Beatles catalog to be available for download ‘soon’ - November 13, 2006
Apple will do ‘everything we can’ to lure The Beatles to iTunes Music Store - May 10, 2006

"Widely available for downloading" and "Widely downloaded" are two different things. Most of the bands mentioned are either long past their prime, or never had a prime...
My favorite was the assholes in Metallica, who avoided it for a long time. They didn't want you to download one single song because "The albums were written as an entire piece and that's how they were meant to be played." Uh yeah. It's not like they were Picasso or Beethoven. They were/are a shmuck metal band worried more about money than art. Were they worried about their albums being played in their entirety, they would never have let the singles be played on the radio, right?
It's amazing. Sometimes the world of online music seems so old, yet sometimes it still seems so young. Not fully embraced.