MacDailyNews - Where Mac news comes first

Isn't MacOSRumors the site that makes $#!t up?

sweet <glances at bank balance>

That's from a report on July the 11th. A little bit old news don't you think?

I don't think they will wait till the end of the year to get the quad core Woodcrests. Anyway the Woodcrests have HyperThreading so 2 dual core chips would look like 8 anyway.

Oh and you can't have 2 Conroe's anyway..

Yeah! That's what I'm talking about. With that and Universal Adobe, I'll be King of the World!

Apple must diverge from standard Intel PC architecture over time if not immediately. There simply is no way to differentiate in a workstation market. The OS is not going to suffice for worstations. Most people don't care what OS they are using as long as it has the apps and doesn't crash. XP doesn't crash and it has most of the apps. Intel Macs DON'T have the apps. Is there any universal binary version of a popular CAD app?

Here is the competition:
http://configure.us.dell.com/dellstore/config.aspx?c=us&cs=19&l=en&oc=DXPS410F1&s=dhs

I congiured one with a 2.4Ghz Core 2 Duo, 2GB RAM, 160GB 10,000rpm SATA drive, NVidia 7900GS 256MB video card, 20" widescreen display for about $2,200.

I can't wait to see what Apple offers!

8 cores at 2.66 Ghz per core with the ability to pair up graphics.

8x2.66 = 21.28 Ghz

Yes, Akido, MOSR is notorious for making up "poop" to drive traffic to the site. Their credibility is zero. I can't believe there's any discussion on this article.

MacOS Rumors just makes up crap all the time. At best, the site gets updated once a week with pure fiction.

These are the same guys who said the iBook would absolutely, positively NOT be called a MacBook. See?

Read their past S@#T and you'll see that fiction is modus operandi at MOSR.

If you trust them for news then you trust Steve Ballmer.

I have to say that my outlook is exactly opposite of tHE dUDE's comments, with the exception of the "doesn't crash" part. When selecting a computer I first look at the OS. If I don't like the OS, I'm not buying the machine. I think OS X is head and shoulders above Windows and therefore I buy Macs. The applications are secondary consideration. Granted, it is not always posssible to get certain jobs done on a Mac with the apps you may want to use, but I am more willing to work around limited app selection when I have to rather than always work around a crappy OS.

sweet <checks lotttery numbers>

And my dog told me there will be 7 cores.

animationstudent-

that looks so sweet, but is so wrong. comparing clock speeds only works when you're comparing the EXACT same architecture. a core 2 duo at 2 ghz is slower than a core 2 duo at 3 ghz. however, a pentium d at 3 ghz is not faster than a core 2 duo at 2 ghz.

plus, the nature of dual core (or multi-core for that matter) means that you don't get a 2x speed increase because both processors aren't working on the same data at the same time.

Total blah, blah, blah b.s. with no specifics.

The guy who made me my coffee at the local Coffee shop said there would be 257 cores. I swear. He said his other job is the assistant to a developer who is in the know at Apple. No joke. He said Steve Jobs comes to this coffee shop all the time, but I can't tell you which shop because then Jobs would get very mad. He said his boss is best friends with Phil Schiller. No joke. The 257 core tower is only gonna cost two thousand dollars.

Thank god I know so many credible sources, or I would probably be lost as far as the computer market goes.

Seriously it's like you are playing some damn role-playing game. You make a post and then you add some brackets to show that your talking to yourself - give me a damn break!

Nerd Alert!

the ambigiously nerdy duo.

Are your real names ACE & Gary?

all rumors but it doesn't take much brain to think that Apple is going toward multi-core heavily. Hell, even Apple reprs simply say that: 64-bit and multi-core.

Rumor: This could be a rumor!

Macosrumors...the site that continuously reloads iself and makes sure a few links are wrong so that you'll come back later in the day hoping they're fixed.

Nothing New

For all of those too scared to visit the technical overview of Apple computers, Apple has always had their own custom controller chips. It's a major reason why you can't build a Mac from off-the-shelf parts.

Although they are not labeled, they can be seen in the iMac Technical Overview PDF (http://images.apple.com/imac/pdf/20060120_iMac_TO.pdf). They are on page 13, and are the two large squares in the middle.

Similar diagrams of previous Mac models clearly have them labeled.

raster: Yeah, me too!

P.S. Ampar is employed again. After only one week. Not bad. Life does go on.

Raster & Ampar = Ace and Gary. If Lance did it, you guys can . . . . or continue to act oblivious.

8 cores at 2.66 Ghz per core with the ability to pair up graphics.

8x2.66 = 21.28 Ghz


Sorry, doesn't work that way.

Adding processors doesn't add to the clock speed.

What multi-cores allows one to do is run more apps at the same time.

Or if you have a really large work load that could be broken up into pieces and each work load sent to a core to work on and the results either sent on to the hard drive, the graphics card or back to the main core faster than if the main core did all the work itself.

Another thing a lot of cores can do is set up a assembly line, each doing a little work and then sending partial results to the next core in the chain. This is especially useful for high end 3D rendering.

With the ability of multiple video cards in a SLI configuration, the video data path is spilt, so each video card is only rendering a percentage of the screen. Thus it can render at a higher detail.


All these multiple cores and video cards are for people with high work loads or using software that will take advantage of it.

Great! So now, we can use our Macs for computing and canoeing. How will Apple integrate a Canoe in it's computers? That's a tremendous challenge even for Apple!

Ampar - Good news. QUICK too. Nice to hear.

MacOSRumors. This is entertainment more than information. They have never been right about a rumor. Please do not make purchasing decisions based on this site. They base their "rumors" on wishes rather than real information. It's fun reading though.

Thanks, ©! Things worked out amazingly well.

"MacOSRumors. This is entertainment more than information."

Looks around.

LOL more fiction than fact. The article speaks like SLI technology is some sort of generic hardware commoditity, when in fact its a Nvidia only feature that requires a Nvidia Nforce 4/5 chipset (and ATI's crossfire naturally requires an ATI chipset). Considering Apple is getting chipsets only from Intel, and Nvidia isn't providing Nforce motherboards (nor is there an acknowledgement of such a partnership between Apple/Nvidia), this "article" is one big belly laugh of ignorance.

MacOSRumors has been promising the mythical 4 and 8 core Macs since the days of the G4 PowerMacs! One of these decades they'll probably be right.
Remember when someone "stole" their domain and started making up stuff that didn't sound too different from the "authentic" rumors.

Custom components...Whether it's true or not, this is something that everybody should be hoping for. So when things are announced, we should all have this on our list of expectations. The MacPro needs to be on top in every way.

I congiured one with a 2.4Ghz Core 2 Duo, 2GB RAM, 160GB 10,000rpm SATA drive, NVidia 7900GS 256MB video card, 20" widescreen display for about $2,200.

Dude, you're getting a Dell?

What the f%@k is wrong with you?

Verbose:
When I said most people I should have said corporate IT staff and CAD, 3D, animation, production staff. Workstation users don't even need an OS for most of their work day. What they NEED are the applications that allow them to get the most work done in the shortest amount off time. Copying files, configuring their network connections and worrying about spyware is not allowed to get in the way of workstations so the security of the OS is secondary to the stabiltiy and speed of the hardware.

The OS is unimportant. As evidenced by the fact that you can run any OS on a Mac. If you can run Windows on a Mac workstation, great. But does it run faster on a Mac? Does the Mac workstation provide important enhancements that PC workstation of the same class and price lack? Yes? Great, NOW add the fact that the MacOS has greater uptime, greater security AND all the applications I need. THEN, I will dump my PC workstations and switch to Macs.

In other words when the applications I need run faster under Windows on a Mac OR when the applications I need are availbable AND/OR run faster on MacOS, the department will switch to Macs.

I'll give the real inside dope. Here it is:
New macs will use the new Amiga custom chip sets that work at 100 GHZ.