MacDailyNews - Where Mac news comes first

 MacDailyNews Poll

Deal of the Day

5 Day Most Commented

Opinion Archive

Current Headlines

Latest Joy of Tech

  • Latest Joy of Tech!

MacNN

AppleInsider

Macworld UK

TUAW

MacRumors

Yahoo! Finance AAPL

iTunes Top 10 Albums

Mac OS X Downloads

Fri, Jul 03, 2009 - 09:50 PM EDT  —  AAPL: 140.02 (-2.81, -1.97%)  |  NASDAQ: 1796.52 (-49.20, -2.67%)

What’s the difference between Mac OS X and Vista? Microsoft employees are excited about Mac OS X
Wednesday, March 22, 2006 - 12:41 PM EDT

"It certainly sounded like Microsoft leadership committed to us, our customers, our partners, and our shareholders that Vista would be out in 2006," Mini-Microsoft, a blog from a Microsoft insider, vents. "Slip!"

"We should have asked for more details around the 'or else' part of that commitment," Mini-Microsoft writes. "I was upset at missing the back-to-school market. Now we're missing the holiday sales market. All of those laptops and PCs are going to have XP on it. What percentage will upgrade to Vista? Well, I guess that's the little dream that I need to give up on. Vista's deployment is going to come from people buying CPUs with the OS pre-installed, not dancing down the CompUSA aisle as they clutch that boxed version of Vista to their loving chest. So not only did we miss last year's opportunity, we're missing this year's opportunity, too. With the convergence of high-tech media, this holiday season would have been an explosive nodal point to get Vista out for a compounded effect."

Mini-Microsoft writes, "People need to be fired and moved out of Microsoft today. Where's the freakin' accountability?"

Some of our favorite comments to the article over on Mini-Microsoft, many of them presumably from Microsoft employees, include:
• Fer cripes sake, just get a Mac already.
• Being a 10+ year [Microsoft] vet I feel ashamed and sad. This company is a mess on so many levels.
• Here's the way out: MS should swallow real hard, ante up half of what they blew on Longwind, and buy an OS X license from Apple. That would be about $10B up-front, and a hefty royalty. MS would have to assume the burden of making it run on all the crapbox PCs out there, which have had all the quality squeezed out of them, due to MS's having sucked up the lion's share of the profit from all PCs for the last 20 years or so. The benefit is that MS could finally ship a securable OS, and the users wouldn't have to lose countless hours trying to work around the malware. Meanwhile, the only semi-competent part of the company, the Mac Business Unit, would take the lead in Apps development.
• Vista is a disaster. The "reset" you mention is nothing less than a FAILURE to SHIP. What you're working on now isn't Longhorn, it's SP4. Don't kid yourself. If you want to salvage your career, flee to Office, or better yet, get the heck out of the company before it all collapses.
• Ballmer is incompetent. The interview mentioned previously is terrible. Ballmer has presided over the fall of Microsoft. He sucks. When are internal folks going to stop falling for this mythological aristocracy? He and Bill are just weak men who aren’t in control.
• Compare this to OS X, where people fall all over themselves trying to get the newest version running on their old hardware because there's actual value in the new features. So Vista has its guts ripped out, slips, and we wait another 5 years for a potentially insipring version of Windows, meanwhile Apple ships another 3 updates to OS X.
• God, we look like DEC more and more every day.
• I took part in a computer trade show early this month in Germany, and Microsoft was showing Vista, and the Microsoft fans were saying it looks like OS X (Apple wasn't there). Apple is on a roll, and we've just given them enough time to get the next version of OS X out the door (whatever animal name it is going to be). And we can guess right now what their marketing push will be: Stop waiting for those guys who can't even copy our old stuff in time. Get the original from us -- we ship on time, we're shipping right now.
• I wonder how many employees at PC hardware companies are wishing they had some way to call up Apple and license OS X for Intel. They could have 10.4 "Tiger" on PC hardware in a matter of weeks.
• What's the difference between Mac OS X and Vista? Microsoft employees are excited about Mac OS X.


Full article, with many more comments, here.

Advertisements:
Apple's brand new iPod Hi-Fi speaker system. Home stereo. Reinvented. Available now for $349 with free shipping.
Apple's new Mac mini. Intel Core, up to 4 times faster. Starting at just $599. Free shipping.
MacBook Pro. The first Mac notebook built upon Intel Core Duo with iLife ’06, Front Row and built-in iSight. Starting at $1999. Free shipping.
iMac. Twice as amazing — Intel Core Duo, iLife ’06, Front Row media experience, Apple Remote, built-in iSight. Starting at $1299. Free shipping.
iPod Radio Remote. Listen to FM radio on your iPod and control everything with a convenient wired remote. Just $49.
iPod. 15,000 songs. 25,000 photos. 150 hours of video. The new iPod. 30GB and 60GB models start at just $299. Free shipping.
Connect iPod to your television set with the iPod AV Cable. Just $19.

Related articles:
Vista delay causes Windows-dependents slump in pre-market trading; Apple rises - March 22, 2006
Enderle on MS Vista slip: 'I personally can not recall Apple ever getting an opportunity like this' - March 21, 2006
Microsoft delays Windows Vista again - this time until January 2007 - March 21, 2006
Thurrott: Microsoft going to get eaten alive over Windows Vista's resemblance to Apple's Mac OS X - March 09, 2006
Episode 2 of Microsoft Windows Vista, Bill Gates CES keynote video spoof now online - January 07, 2006
Microsoft Windows Vista, Bill Gates keynote video spoof debuts online - January 06, 2006
NY Times' Pogue on Gates' CES demo: Most of Vista features unadulterated ripoffs from Apple Mac OS X - January 05, 2006
Analyst: Windows Vista may still impress many consumers because they have not seen Apple's Mac OS X - January 05, 2006
Microsoft Vista: long-delayed and pared-down - December 14, 2005
Microsoft Windows Vista compared to Apple Mac OS X - December 05, 2005
Gartner: Ignore Microsoft Windows Vista until 2008 (why not just get Apple Mac OS X Tiger today?) - November 12, 2005
Microsoft's Windows Vista strives to deliver what Apple's Mac OS X already offers - October 10, 2005
Apple to unleash Leopard on Microsoft's Windows Longhorn; Mac OS X 10.5 due late 2006 - early 2007 - June 07, 2005
Thurrott: many of Windows Vista's upcoming features appeared first in Apple's Mac OS X - September 26, 2005
Microsoft's Ballmer: It's true, some of Windows Vista's features are 'kissing cousins' to Mac OS X - September 19, 2005
Microsoft suffers from malaise, key defections, Windows Vista struggles, lack of towels - September 16, 2005
PC World: Microsoft innovation - an oxymoron - September 15, 2005
Hackers already targeting viruses for Microsoft's Windows Vista - August 04, 2005
Windows tech writer Thurrott: 'In many ways, Mac OS X Tiger is simply better than Windows' - May 07, 2005
Thurrott: 'Longhorn is in complete disarray and in danger of collapsing under its own weight' - April 27, 2005
Windows czar Allchin says Apple copying Microsoft's Windows Longhorn - April 27, 2005
Thurrott: Longhorn 'has the makings of a train wreck' - April 26, 2005
Thurrott: Longhorn demos 'unimpressive, fall short of graphical excellence found today in Mac OS X' - April 26, 2005
Microsoft employees leaving due to (and blogging about) malaise smothering company - April 25, 2005
eWEEK Editor Coursey: Longhorn so far 'looks shockingly like a Macintosh' - April 25, 2005
Due in late 2006, many of Windows Longhorn's features have been in Mac OS X since 2001 - April 25, 2005
Microsoft's new mantra: 'It Just Works' ripped straight from Apple's 'Switch' campaign - April 22, 2005
Apple CEO Steve Jobs on Microsoft's Longhorn: 'They are shamelessly copying us' - April 21, 2005
Microsoft's Windows Longhorn will bear more than just a passing resemblance to Apple's Mac OS X - April 15, 2005
The Age: 'Apple's Mac OS X at least a generation ahead of Windows XP, iMac G5 clearly the best' - December 15, 2004
Silicon Valley: Apple CEO Steve Jobs previews 'Longhorn' - June 29, 2004
Apple CEO Steve Jobs: Mac OS X Tiger 'is going to drive the copycats crazy - June 28, 2004
Apple's CEO Steve Jobs previews Mac OS X 10.4 'Tiger' to ship in the first half of 2005 - June 28, 2004
Apple takes dead aim at Microsoft, 'Longhorn' with WWDC Mac OS X 10.4 'Tiger' ads - June 28, 2004
PC Magazine: Microsoft 'Longhorn' preview shows 'an Apple look' - May 06, 2004
Microsoft concerned that Longhorn's look and feel will be copied if revealed too soon - August 25, 2003
Windows 'Longhorn' to add translucent windows that ripple and shrink by 2005 - May 19, 2003
Apple leads; Wintel follows as usual - November 11, 2002

Bookmark and Share

Always -- Free ground shipping with orders over $50 at the Apple Store.

Reader Feedback: = registered.
Unregistered users: Feedback from multiple usernames are subject to deletion. Off-topic and posts from suspected astroturfers will be removed.

Mar 22, 06 - 02:04 pm Comment from: Eric

Wow. Simply......wow.

Mar 22, 06 - 02:14 pm Comment from: Beryllium

More confirmation of the Truth of Dilbert.

Mar 22, 06 - 02:14 pm Comment from: Tromba

Amazing. Simply amazing.

MW: cause, as in "MS hubris and incompetence is the cause of their collapse."

Mar 22, 06 - 02:14 pm Comment from: Jon

So true so true.

Mar 22, 06 - 02:14 pm Comment from: MacDude

What's the difference between Mac OS X and Vista? Microsoft employees are excited about Mac OS X.

They can be as excited as they want, because if they want a job they will be using Vista

And that's the truth, Apple doesn't care about enterprise, see this:

http://viewfromthemountain.typepad.com/applepeels/2006/03/lingering_regre.html

Mar 22, 06 - 02:16 pm Comment from: Tempus Fugit

this comes as no surprise. it's a wonder the hue and cry isnt louder.

Mar 22, 06 - 02:19 pm Comment from: charlie

MacDude:

To paraphrase the president, " don't you have a job to go to...".

In other words, stop posting inane, childish comments on here and get back to work - or school.

Mar 22, 06 - 02:24 pm Comment from: MacDude

don't you have a job to go to...".

Your right, I've been using Mac's forever and I could have had a high paying IT job if I was trained on Windows.

Probally my own computer store...

I Build U A PC

My own corporation...

I Build U A PC, Inc.

My own website...

I Build U A PC.com


Oh but no... I'm using a platform that works so well that nobody will hire me as a serious IT tech.

So I come here on the Library Mac and annoy you, hahaha.

Mar 22, 06 - 02:25 pm Comment from: MacDude

I sleep in the bushes when the Library closes and take a shower in the local pool too.

My life was ruined by Apple.

Mar 22, 06 - 02:32 pm Comment from: Andy C.

Ouch. That's gotta hurt!

Mar 22, 06 - 02:39 pm Comment from: View from the Inside

Take it for what it's worth; Believe me or not:

The sentiment in that article is not all that amazing, and confirms what those of us on the "inside" have known for quite awhile now: Microsoft is an entity that has grown too big to be controlled.

Perhaps the biggest corporation in the history of human existence (depending on how you quantify the statement), and one that vies for technological leadership on a continuing basis.

And constantly fails.

And is being "run" by a salesman.

My heartfelt and long-pondered advice: Do NOT invest in this company.

Unless something major-league and systemically-altering happens here with the release of Vista, I predict it will fracture and implode over the next decade (if it takes that long) and either be split into smaller pieces or cease to exist. Or both.

There is a dark, dark, pall here. There is also very, very little open dialogue about what our "competitor" is doing or about how to "seize the day", so to speak. Why? Because there are no true leaders here - and certainly none that can compete with the vision of someone like Jobs.

Anyone who worked here at one time and had any of those qualities is long gone. Any possible other candidates, if they still linger, are keeping quiet for fear of their jobs.

I know whereof I speak.

Mar 22, 06 - 02:41 pm Comment from: Viridian

This merely confirms the reports of very low morale inside Microsoft and the increasing difficulty they have in attracting and retaining the best and brightest. It is patently unfair to categorize Microsoft's engineers as "stupid"; they certainly are not, and many people who looked at the leaked Windows code had nothing but praise for their talents, particularly in finding work-arounds for the mess of spaghetti that is Windows. The often obscene comments embedded in the code were notable for the fury and frustration that the engineers felt at the entire unholy mess, and that they were being called on to polish up a big pile of excrement instead of writing something better.

Microsoft has simply been unable to capitalize on their in-house talent because of their culture. The marketers and MBA's have greater say than the engineers. The Mac Business Unit is the proof of this. They have much greater autonomy than the other units, and only a dyed-in-the-wool Microsoft hater could claim that they don't produce excellent software. They are only hobbled by the higher-ups who put the brakes on their work in order to maintain parity with the Windows versions of their offerings. It would be disastrous for the Windows unit if the MacBU consistently produced superior software.

Mar 22, 06 - 02:48 pm Comment from: Jimbo von Winskinheimer

MacDude,

It's an interesting read, but it's also what is known a anecdotal evidence. These days, you can find a blog from one person or another that has left the company and has a bad taste in their mouth for every company out there. This is one man's opinion, not some exciting expose.

Next....

Mar 22, 06 - 02:51 pm Comment from: justme2

Micro$oft execs should re-read "The Boy Who Cried Wolf". If they keep announcing all these grand ideas, then don't deliver, soon no one's going to pay attention to them. And certainly no one is going to run out and upgrade to Vista until at least SP1 is out. My dad-in-law is just now upgrading to XP because M$ has announced they're discontinuing support for Win2K -- and his support guru has practically moved into the house to do the upgrade. DIL is not going to be rushing out to upgrade to Vista if it means replacing his software that he had to replace to work with XP (I gave him a $250 gift certificate to Fry's for Christmas -- he was very grateful.)

The most interesting thing about the comments was how overworked the peons over at M$ feel, and how demoralized...how everything seems to be caught up in red tape, and the "L61" "L80" and all the other demarcations of rulership. Haven't heard any leaks about that from over at Infinite Loop...wonder if Apple's seeing an increase in resumes with Redmond and Seattle addresses?

Mar 22, 06 - 02:52 pm Comment from: Bill Gates

" Take it for what it's worth; Believe me or not:

The sentiment in that article is not all that amazing, and confirms what those of us on the "inside" have known for quite awhile now: Microsoft is an entity that has grown too big to be controlled.

Perhaps the biggest corporation in the history of human existence (depending on how you quantify the statement), and one that vies for technological leadership on a continuing basis.

And constantly fails.

And is being "run" by a salesman.

My heartfelt and long-pondered advice: Do NOT invest in this company.

Unless something major-league and systemically-altering happens here with the release of Vista, I predict it will fracture and implode over the next decade (if it takes that long) and either be split into smaller pieces or cease to exist. Or both.

There is a dark, dark, pall here. There is also very, very little open dialogue about what our "competitor" is doing or about how to "seize the day", so to speak. Why? Because there are no true leaders here - and certainly none that can compete with the vision of someone like Jobs.

Anyone who worked here at one time and had any of those qualities is long gone. Any possible other candidates, if they still linger, are keeping quiet for fear of their jobs.

I know whereof I speak."


Is that you Balmer?

Mar 22, 06 - 02:55 pm Comment from: wow

man, what a sad sad day for microsoft. but you reap what you so. window's is crap, and vista is more crap.

note to microsoft: either sh*t or get of the pot. ya hear me!!!1

Mar 22, 06 - 02:55 pm Comment from: theMacDude

MacDude - you, Vista, and the ex-Apple employee's blog you reference are slipping so far into irrelevance it is not funny. Did you know that he had to shut down his comments a while back because they refuted most of his outdated assertions? Of course you didn't. You are, as I say, irrelevant. Not to mention bandwidth you eating up.

Mar 22, 06 - 02:57 pm Comment from: abqMac

Maybe this is a big opportunity for Apple. If they were to produce a 'boxed' version of OS X that current PC users could install on their current PCs, even if it were a limited "trial" version, it might convince a lot of PC users to switch before they buy a new PC with XP installed.

Mar 22, 06 - 03:08 pm Comment from: Verbose

zipper

Mar 22, 06 - 03:10 pm Comment from: The Other Steve

All Microsoft has to do is, starting with the Christmas season, ship WinTel box's with XP installed and a certificate for a free Vista (or SP4) box when it ships. What's the big deal?
Unless. . . . they don't listen to me.

Mar 22, 06 - 03:11 pm Comment from: JadisOne

I love this comment:

I took part in a computer trade show early this month in Germany, and Microsoft was showing Vista, and the Microsoft fans were saying it looks like OS X (Apple wasn't there). Apple is on a roll, and we've just given them enough time to get the next version of OS X out the door (whatever animal name it is going to be). And we can guess right now what their marketing push will be: Stop waiting for those guys who can't even copy our old stuff in time. Get the original from us -- we ship on time, we're shipping right now.

Apple, are you listening? Get your advertising dollars to work and seize the moment. Now you have Microsofties telling you how to advertising your product over theirs.

Mar 22, 06 - 03:13 pm Comment from: Quevar

Interesting Apple ad from the article: "Stop waiting for those guys who can't even copy our old stuff in time. Get the original from us -- we ship on time, we're shipping right now."

Apple has a perfect opportunity coming in this Holiday season. I just hope they start to ramp up production and advertise their computers. People will come running if they could see these computers in action. I can only hope Apple does not blow this opportunity.

Leopard will still be able to compete very well against Vista, but Tiger is so far ahead of XP. They just need to let people know it.

Mar 22, 06 - 03:14 pm Comment from: Ampar

Priceless.

Mar 22, 06 - 03:18 pm Comment from: Stanford

Sputnik . . . oh SPUTNIK!

Where ARE you, dear Sputnik? Eating some more crow, perhaps? Man, you must be getting tired of feathers and bones by now, huh?

Mar 22, 06 - 03:19 pm Comment from: LaserKun

When I first saw the Mac OS X demo at the Tokyo MacWorld Expo (forgot the year, about 7 years ago?), I stated to some Japanese guys working there to mark my words, "Windows will die within about 10 years". That's the first time I made that statement, and after buying and using OS X since it first became available, I have been even more convinced I was right.

Notice, I did not say MS will die (although stranger things have happened), but that Windows will die. I think the time is very short now...

MDN Magic Word: "provided", as in MS has provided Apple a great opportunity. Who would have thought...

Mar 22, 06 - 03:20 pm Comment from: gotcha

now we know where the hackers are coming from!

Mar 22, 06 - 03:31 pm Comment from: jay

Where's Spudnik? I'm sure his spin would be of interest to all of us.

Mar 22, 06 - 03:38 pm Comment from: Bartsimpsonhead

Rats leaving a sinking ship! Or just wishing to?

Isn''t it time to up the 'Star Trek' project to 'Warp Factor 10', and get it running on those ugly grey 'Kling-ing on' ships (PCs).

Captain Kirk wouldn't have waited this long...

Mar 22, 06 - 03:44 pm Comment from: jay

Oops! I meant Sputnik. Actually, maybe I didn't. And jimbo's so-called "anecdotal" evidence sure didn't sound like "one person or another". I don't think he read the article in any event. It was a s**t load of seemingly current MS employees, not "one man's opinion."

Mar 22, 06 - 03:45 pm Comment from: Edgeley Exile 43

It looks like it really is as bad as we've been hearing. Microsoft would have been better of if the DOJ had split them in two. At least then one half wouldn't be saddled with Steve Ballmer as CEO.

Paul Thurrott's sentiments come to mind "Vista has all the makings of a train wreck." Paul could be right (for once).

Mar 22, 06 - 03:54 pm Comment from: Yera

Stop feeding the troll. Why don't you guys ever learn? Ignore him.

Mar 22, 06 - 03:55 pm Comment from: Jim

unbelievable..... I never knew it was this bad at MS. It looks worse that what Apple went through before SJ came back... seriously, will they be able to recover?

Apple did, but that's because of visionary leadership, a couple of timely products (imac, ipod), and some industry luck.

Will MS be able to find/create even one of these three?

Mar 22, 06 - 03:57 pm Comment from: MacDude

Just what we have been saying for some long time now...

I love the expression: Microsofts's "mythological aristocracy".

To use the expression of David Cameron, Gates and Ballmer are analog men in a digital world...

Last word:- Apple needs to be wary of adopting the MS employees suggestion of licensing OSX to MS to distribute.. they might even fail at that too.

Mar 22, 06 - 04:11 pm Comment from: Dank

fearing the the rebirth of the clone wars....

(...and no I am not talking about Star Wars, learn your Apple history.)

Mar 22, 06 - 04:15 pm Comment from: Ardie

Guys like Gates, et al., have for a long time conflated free enterprise with capitalism.

Capitalism's real goal is monopolistic power and privilege. This explains why so many companies go belly-up. They are not committed to innovation, design and, above all, their public, which are vital elements of a free enterprise system.

The goal of Apple is different. Apple's goal is to market superior hardware and software designed to meet the public's needs--not the needs of narcissistic CEOs.

Mar 22, 06 - 04:58 pm Comment from: Casey Jones

Does anyone sense a train wreck coming up ahead?

MDN word: dark

Its looking kinda dark in Redmond.

Mar 22, 06 - 05:03 pm Comment from: MacDude

Please, forget my previous behaviour.

I heart Apple.

It's just that I was abused as a child.

Oh, this sucks. I want a girlfriend.

Mar 22, 06 - 05:06 pm Comment from: Nautical

My God! The disgust in those MS-employee comments outshine even most of the vitriol that can be heard in the MDN comments.

Mar 22, 06 - 05:28 pm Comment from: Bill McCloskey

Microsoft Vista - Maybe they should rename it to... Microsoft Horizon. LOL

Mar 22, 06 - 05:38 pm Comment from: Jooop

I just have one question: Why does Jim Alchin still have a job?

Mar 22, 06 - 05:45 pm Comment from: MacDude's Shadow

MD, Go drown yourself you freakin' fat sack of lard.

You got fired from Apple 'cuz you ate all the coffeeroom donuts.

Please stay out of Canada, 'cuz we'll close all the TimHorton's, and hide all the TimBits.

Mar 22, 06 - 06:05 pm Comment from: Bloke

[• Here's the way out: MS should swallow real hard, ante up half of what they blew on Longwind, and buy an OS X license from Apple. That would be about $10B up-front, and a hefty royalty. MS would have to assume the burden of making it run on all the crapbox PCs out there, which have had all the quality squeezed out of them, due to MS's having sucked up the lion's share of the profit from all PCs for the last 20 years or so. The benefit is that MS could finally ship a securable OS, and the users wouldn't have to lose countless hours trying to work around the malware. Meanwhile, the only semi-competent part of the company, the Mac Business Unit, would take the lead in Apps development.]
-

Or better still, Apple can - on there own - offer OSX 10.3 Panther for the OEM 'PC' makers. And two months after Leopard ships, offer 10.4 Tiger.

Everyone in 'PC' land would be happy. Intel, Dell, HP, PC folk.

Well, everyone except MS. Ballmer would throw himself out a 'window'.

Mar 22, 06 - 06:10 pm Comment from: Robert Pritchett

I felt the "rage" after spending $10K on a "useless" MCSE certification for NT and jumped to the Mac much earlier so I had some perspective on the situation. I walked away from "lucrative", because I knew in my heart that one day I would have to answer for taking folks to the cleaners because of bad operating systems that sucked away their business profits. I found a "better way" with Macs and my mission at macCompanion is to help others also find better tools to do their jobs.

Mar 22, 06 - 06:50 pm Comment from: gypsy

'Bloke'

Some many moons ago, Strata sold their 3 products for shipping only (or something rediculously cheap). Afterwards, they sent out welcoome letters and offered updates to the newest version for a discount. It worked. They got me to do it. For less than $100 I had 3 very decent graphics and media programs.

Give 'em a taste, then they'll want to drink.

Mar 22, 06 - 06:52 pm Comment from: Edgeley Exile 43

Robert Pritchett

You paid for an NT4 course? Why didn't you learn it out of a book in an afternoon like everyone else did? They had to be the easiest IT exams ever.

Typical NT4 exam question:-

A user in Accounts calls to say she can't log onto her PC. You check her account and it is not disabled, and the WINS database shows her PC as Tombstoned. What could be the problem?

A: The DHCP scope is fully allocated
B: The Planet Mars is in the House of Saturn
C: A dog
D: Don't use NetWare!!!


Rather expensive way to learn from a mistake. No wonder you were mad.

P.S. The answer you should have chosen was D. It was a Microsoft exam after all wink

Mar 22, 06 - 06:59 pm Comment from: maczealot

Windows is the world “standard” for PC operating systems only because Microsoft has lowered the threshold for reliability and resourcefulness. Fortunately, others would prefer to raise the criteria for excellence and commercial relevance rather than diminish performance to a bare minimum of acceptability.

Mar 22, 06 - 07:29 pm Comment from: mchavo

If ONLY Apple would actually advertise and market OS X, dammit!

Mar 22, 06 - 08:17 pm Comment from: Not Bill

It is great to see the evil empire struggle so. Yet, does it really make any difference to us in the orchard?

If "Longwait" never did show up, wouldn't the vast majorty of the computers continue to run Microsoft? They provide a standard opperating system and the world wants that.

As I have been led to understand, Steve wants it that way too. "Apple is not an enterprise company it is a consumer company."

If this is the case, I feel fortunate I can buy and use Apple computers and play my music on an iPod. Too bad about most of the rest of the world. Lucky us.

Mar 22, 06 - 08:40 pm Comment from: Townshend

I couldn't agree more, 'Not Bill'.

Mar 22, 06 - 09:25 pm Comment from: Robert Pritchett

Edgeley Exile 43;

Thanks for the humor.

Dumb me. I was working on PCs and networking systems for a year and also got my MCP and Internet certs as well, supporting a family and also working on a Masters degree at the same time.

I figured MS and MCSEs were an honest bunch. I was proved wrong. I flew on planes tha thad MCSEs working in Seattle at the time billing (bilking?) customers for over $700 per hour. Back then an MCSE was worth much more than the cert is today. Perception is everything.

I am a slow learn, slow burn kind of guy and what doesn't kill us only makes us stronger and maybe wiser.

Reader feedback page 1 of 2 pages:  1 2 >

Always -- Free ground shipping with orders over $50 at the Apple Store.

Add Your Feedback:

Register or Login

Name:

Email: (optional)

Emoticons | Allowed HTML Tags

Remember my info   Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the "MDN Magic Word" you see in the image below: